제품

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions counts as a warning, not a service level. A competent team returns questions first: about integrations. A supplier that commits to a figure before understanding the scope is probably pricing a guess, and that guess resurfaces as a change order — and you will pay for it.

Look out for any distance between the team in the pitch and the people who will code. Insist on named engineers in the statement of work, with a clause covering replacement. A team that only offers abstract roles and refuses to name individuals is preserving the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Require access to the repository from the first week. A provider that shows code only at milestones expects you to trust a black box. Daily commits tell you the actual pace far better than a slide deck. The same holds for the automated test suite: if there is no pipeline, assurances about quality are unverifiable.

Ambiguous phrasing around intellectual property is not an accident. The document needs to state plainly that the code, go development company designs and documentation belong to the client as they are paid for. Also check the governing law and how payments are structured: heavy prepayment with no deliverable attached removes the only leverage you have.

Lastly, fixed price contract software development examine how they communicate. Confirm how much working-time overlap you will share each day, who is expected to answer your questions and within what time. A few hours of overlap generally works; none at all converts each small question into a day of delay. Unclear written communication in the early emails will not improve later.